The Protected Disclosures Act 2000 - colloquially known as the "Whistleblowers Act" - came into force on 1 January 2001. It provides protection for employees who, in accordance with the Act, make disclosures of information about serious wrongdoings.
In 1994 Neil Pugmire, a nurse at Lake Alice Hospital, expressed concerns to the management over the release of dangerous psychiatric patients into the community. Dissatisfied with the response, he went public with his concerns. He was suspended and later dismissed for his actions. (The Employment Court subsequently reinstated him.)
The purpose of this Act is to promote public interest in the disclosure of important information - by facilitating the disclosure and investigation of matters of serious wrongdoing in or by an organisation. The Act provides procedures under which such disclosures can be made and gives statutory protection from liability or unfavourable treatment for employees making disclosures. The term "employee" is defined to include former employees, home workers, persons seconded to an organisation, and independent contractors working for an organisation.
To qualify as a protected disclosure under the Act the information must relate to "serious wrongdoing". This includes:
In addition the "whistleblower" employee must:
In general, the Act provides that disclosures must be made in accordance with internal procedures established by and published within the organisation. It is mandatory for public sector organisations to establish internal procedures.
Private sector organisations are not required to have internal procedures; but if they do, employees will be encouraged to make disclosures internally to the organisation rather than going public.
The procedures must be appropriate for receiving and dealing with information about serious wrongdoing within the organisation. The procedures must comply with the principles of natural justice, identify the persons in the organisation to whom a disclosure may be made, and include reference to an appropriate Authority in certain circumstances (where, for example, the person making a disclosure does not feel that it is being taken seriously or being adequately investigated). Information about the existence of internal procedures must be published widely within the organisation and at regular intervals.
Despite the mandatory obligations, there is no provision in the Act providing for a penalty in cases of non-compliance. In the absence of specific internal procedures, the disclosure process is less defined. An employee is simply required to make a disclosure to the head or deputy head of an organisation. If the employee believes that the head of the organisation is implicated in the wrongdoing, then disclosure may be made directly to the "appropriate Authority". An appropriate Authority includes the Commissioner of Police, Solicitor-General, Ombudsman, or Director of the Serious Fraud Office.
Our recommendation is that employers should adopt a policy relating to employee disclosures about serious wrongdoing. The policy should comply with the spirit intended in the Protected Disclosures Act by:
If your organisation requires further information about the Protected Disclosures Act or assistance to develop a procedure policy, contact the Bell Gully Employment Law Team.
This publication is necessarily brief and general in nature. You should seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters dealt with in this publication.